No One Has Ever Announced That Because

In A Free System Any Large, Popular, Revolutionary Movement Should Be Able To Bring About Its Ends By Such A Voluntary Process. As More And More People See How It Works More And More Will Wish To Participate In Or Support It. And So It Will Grow, Without Being Necessary To Force Everyone Or A Majority Or Anyone Into The Pattern.

Wisdom Is Not Just Knowing Fundamental Truths, If These Are Unconnected With The Guidance Of Life Or With A Perspective On Its Meaning. If The Deep Truths Physicists Describe About The Origin And Functioning Of The Universe Have Little Practical Import And Do Not Change Our Picture Of The Meaning Of The Universe And Our Place Within It, Then Knowing Them Would Not Count As Wisdom.

It Is, From Another Angle, An Attack On Requiring Proof In Philosophy. And It's Also The Case, I Guess, That My Temperament Is To Like Interesting, New, Bold Ideas, And To Try And Generate Them.

The Illegitimate Use Of A State By Economic Interests For Their Own Ends Is Based Upon A Preexisting Illegitimate Power Of The State To Enrich Some Persons At The Expense Of Others. Eliminate That Illegitimate Power Of Giving Differential Economic Benefits And You Eliminate Or Drastically Restrict The Motive For Wanting Political Influence.

Why Are Philosophers Intent On Forcing Others To Believe Things? Is That A Nice Way To Behave Towards Someone?