Philip Glass Once Told Me, "they Can

It's So Much Easier To Make A Movie About Someone Who Is So Likeable That You Just Want To Get Out Of The Way.

When You Start Talking About The Known Knowns And The Unknown Unknowns, You're Thrown Into A Crazy Meta-level Discussion. Do I Know What I Know, Do I Know What I Don't Know, Do I Know What I Don't Know I Don't Know. It Becomes A Strange, Lewis Carroll - Like Nursery Rhyme.

Robert Nozick [a Havard Philosopher, Famous For His Book "anarchy, State And Utopia"] Defined Revenge As Delivering The Message That You Know What Someone Has Done, And It Doesn't Involve Hurting Them Or Doing Anything To Them Beyond That. It's Just Delivering The Message That Their Crime Has Been Noted Not Just By Its Victims, Because The Victim Might Be Dead, But By Another Who Has A Different Moral View And Will Challenge The Perpetrator's View.

I Think We Get Into All Kinds Of Difficulty By Saying Photographs Should Be Taken In A Certain Way Which Guarantees Their Veracity. I Think That's A Slippery Slope To Hell.

You Can Ask Yourself, If A Film Makes A Claim, Is The Claim True Or False? Having Said That, A Style Of Presenting Material Doesn't Guarantee Truth. There's This Crazy Idea That Somehow You Pick A Style, And By Virtue Of Picking The Style, You've Provided Something That Is More Truthful. It's As If You Imagine That Changing The Font On A Sentence You Write Makes It More Truthful.