Maybe It's My Libertarian Philosophy: But Being

The International Criminal Court Uses A Prosecution-only Approach. And By Putting Their Fate In The Hands Of Outsiders, Countries Are Really Dodging Responsibility For Actions Taken In The Name Of That Country, In The Name Of The People In That Country, By The People Of That Country Themselves. That Is, I Think, Fundamentally The Wrong Direction To Go In.

There's No Such Thing As The United Nations. If The U.n. Secretary Building In New York Lost 10 Stories, It Wouldn't Make A Bit Of Difference.

I Don't Much Believe In Bumper Sticker Characterizations Of Foreign Policy.

If A Prosecutor In The Hague Decides That The U.s. Has Not Followed Through Effectively On An Investigation - Is Unwilling Or Unable To Carry It Through - Then That Person, That Prosecutor, In An Unreviewable Fashion Gets To Second-guess The United States? That Is Unacceptable. That Is An Assertion Of Authority Over And Above The U.s. Constitution.

Don't Get Me Wrong: I Would Love To Be President.